Examiner Nathan M. Nutter

Grant ratio: 82.2% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 1765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2020
Grant ratio 82.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
61046
Primary art unit
1765
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,211
Granted applications
996

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 58.0% 1.86
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.73 2,101 office actions across 1,217 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,217 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 684 56.2%
2 OAs 342 28.1%
3 OAs 107 8.8%
4 OAs 42 3.5%
5+ OAs 42 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 44.4% 2008 2009: 63.6% 2009 2010: 82.2% 2010 2011: 86.4% 2011 2012: 89.6% 2012 2013: 91.2% 2013 2014: 84.5% 2014 2015: 85.1% 2015 2016: 90.8% 2016 2017: 86.8% 2017 2018: 89.7% 2018 2019: 84.5% 2019 2020: 89.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008813644.4%
20091107063.6%
20101078882.2%
20111038986.4%
2012968689.6%
20131029391.2%
2014847184.5%
2015877485.1%
2016988990.8%
2017917986.8%
2018877889.7%
2019978284.5%
2020686189.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,217 0.6% 17.5% 53.9% 7.0%
Action 2 533 0.2% 22.3% 51.8% 6.0%
Action 3 191 0.0% 20.4% 67.5% 3.1%
Action 4 84 0.0% 20.2% 63.1% 7.1%
Action 5 42 0.0% 9.5% 76.2% 7.1%
Action 6 15 0.0% 20.0% 73.3% 6.7%
Action 7 9 0.0% 33.3% 44.4% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 8 of 2,101 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.7%
0.5%
2014: Alice
0.6%
0.7%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 2, 2021 15/535,273 Affirmed §103
Aug. 16, 2016 12/869,363 Affirmed §103
Jul. 20, 2016 13/057,391 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 19, 2016 11/708,342 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 8, 2016 12/909,099 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
May. 2, 2011 10/551,679 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.