Examiner Robert Sellers

Grant ratio: 61.8% (34th percentile in Art Unit 1765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.01. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2016
Grant ratio 61.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.01
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
61475
Primary art unit
1765
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
618
Granted applications
382

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 58.0% 1.86
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.96 1,210 office actions across 618 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 618 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 300 48.5%
2 OAs 176 28.5%
3 OAs 63 10.2%
4 OAs 48 7.8%
5+ OAs 31 5.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 42.5% 2008 2009: 52.4% 2009 2010: 60.0% 2010 2011: 70.1% 2011 2012: 69.1% 2012 2013: 69.1% 2013 2014: 67.2% 2014 2015: 65.1% 2015 2016: 69.4% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008803442.5%
2009824352.4%
2010804860.0%
2011775470.1%
2012684769.1%
2013684769.1%
2014644367.2%
2015634165.1%
2016362569.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 618 0.5% 11.3% 80.3% 3.6%
Action 2 318 0.3% 6.3% 79.6% 7.5%
Action 3 142 0.0% 1.4% 90.1% 4.2%
Action 4 79 0.0% 3.8% 86.1% 5.1%
Action 5 31 0.0% 0.0% 90.3% 3.2%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,210 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
18.8% 3/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
18.8% 3/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 21, 2016 13/555,777 Affirmed §103
Aug. 30, 2016 12/702,446 Affirmed §103
Aug. 3, 2016 13/446,332 Affirmed §103
Jul. 18, 2016 13/056,194 Affirmed §103
Jul. 15, 2016 12/599,846 Affirmed §103
Apr. 22, 2016 12/468,495 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 23, 2015 13/213,989 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 25, 2015 12/017,747 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 23, 2013 12/338,396 Reversed N/A
Jul. 19, 2013 12/511,389 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 12, 2013 12/447,612 Affirmed §103
Feb. 21, 2013 12/026,221 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.