Examiner Caixia Lu

Grant ratio: 82.9% (90th percentile in Art Unit 1765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 82.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74838
Primary art unit
1765
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,044
Granted applications
865

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 58.0% 1.86
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.64 1,722 office actions across 1,050 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,050 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 643 61.2%
2 OAs 253 24.1%
3 OAs 85 8.1%
4 OAs 39 3.7%
5+ OAs 30 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 77.8% 2008 2009: 72.1% 2009 2010: 71.0% 2010 2011: 81.5% 2011 2012: 71.8% 2012 2013: 78.3% 2013 2014: 89.8% 2014 2015: 90.9% 2015 2016: 89.1% 2016 2017: 92.3% 2017 2018: 89.1% 2018 2019: 85.5% 2019 2020: 85.9% 2020 2021: 87.3% 2021 2022: 81.7% 2022 2023: 85.4% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 81.8% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008453577.8%
2009614472.1%
2010694971.0%
2011544481.5%
2012715171.8%
2013695478.3%
2014595389.8%
2015777090.9%
2016645789.1%
2017656092.3%
2018554989.1%
2019625385.5%
2020645585.9%
2021554887.3%
2022604981.7%
2023484185.4%
2024554480.0%
202511981.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,050 0.6% 11.6% 58.9% 23.8%
Action 2 407 0.2% 16.0% 70.0% 12.5%
Action 3 154 0.0% 5.2% 73.4% 19.5%
Action 4 69 0.0% 4.3% 71.0% 23.2%
Action 5 30 0.0% 10.0% 56.7% 33.3%
Action 6 11 0.0% 18.2% 63.6% 18.2%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 1 of 128 office actions
All years 0.4% 7 of 1,722 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 14 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
6.3% 1/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
12.5% 2/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 1, 2020 14/900,622 Affirmed §103
Jun. 28, 2016 12/665,199 Affirmed §103
Mar. 20, 2014 11/846,676 Affirmed §103
Mar. 28, 2013 11/508,772 Affirmed §103
Mar. 26, 2013 11/665,706 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 5, 2012 12/032,892 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 23, 2012 12/116,365 Reversed N/A
Aug. 21, 2012 11/897,361 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 21, 2012 11/665,713 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 21, 2012 11/665,717 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2011 10/512,388 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2011 10/589,306 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.