Examiner Katarzyna I Kolb

Grant ratio: 21.8% (17th percentile in Art Unit 1767 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 21.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77177
Primary art unit
1767
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
271
Granted applications
59
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1127
Supervisor
Mark Eashoo
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1046

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 44.7% 2.28
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.06 559 office actions across 271 applications
Applications with office actions 92.3% 250 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 21 7.7%
1 OA 106 39.1%
2 OAs 70 25.8%
3 OAs 27 10.0%
4 OAs 27 10.0%
5+ OAs 20 7.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 25.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2024: 56.3% 2024 2025: 39.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008341750.0%
200911100.0%
20101300.0%
2011800.0%
2012400.0%
20134125.0%
2014900.0%
20152600.0%
202416956.3%
2025793139.2%
20267700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 250 2.0% 9.6% 66.0% 2.0%
Action 2 144 0.0% 7.6% 71.5% 1.4%
Action 3 74 0.0% 4.1% 79.7% 1.4%
Action 4 47 2.1% 2.1% 76.6% 4.3%
Action 5 20 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 6 of 336 office actions
All years 1.1% 6 of 559 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
5.3%
2025: August memo
0.5%
2.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2015 10/547,992 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 2, 2015 11/728,831 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 26, 2015 12/519,977 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 19, 2015 12/980,390 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 29, 2015 11/449,265 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2013 12/299,041 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 19, 2012 12/041,953 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2012 11/596,426 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.