Examiner Josephine Chang

Grant ratio: 55.0% (44th percentile in Art Unit 1768 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.68. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2022
Grant ratio 55.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.68
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88593
Primary art unit
1768
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
522
Granted applications
287

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 8 57.5% 2.32
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.85 1,525 office actions across 536 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 536 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 142 26.5%
2 OAs 173 32.3%
3 OAs 65 12.1%
4 OAs 60 11.2%
5+ OAs 96 17.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 55.9% 2013 2014: 29.1% 2014 2015: 46.5% 2015 2016: 45.6% 2016 2017: 51.0% 2017 2018: 63.8% 2018 2019: 56.8% 2019 2020: 68.5% 2020 2021: 52.4% 2021 2022: 70.7% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20129666.7%
2013341955.9%
2014551629.1%
2015432046.5%
2016572645.6%
2017492551.0%
2018583763.8%
2019442556.8%
2020735068.5%
2021422252.4%
2022584170.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 536 0.7% 9.1% 60.6% 1.3%
Action 2 394 0.0% 7.6% 87.6% 3.3%
Action 3 221 0.0% 4.1% 91.9% 2.3%
Action 4 156 0.0% 3.2% 92.9% 1.3%
Action 5 96 0.0% 4.2% 94.8% 0.0%
Action 6 58 0.0% 1.7% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 7 36 0.0% 2.8% 94.4% 2.8%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,525 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.9%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 4/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 6/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 18, 2023 16/462,013 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 13, 2023 16/461,968 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 5, 2023 15/841,028 Affirmed §103 · §120
May. 7, 2019 13/511,527 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 12, 2019 14/568,230 Reversed §103
Oct. 10, 2018 13/386,210 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2018 14/347,118 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 17, 2018 13/490,588 Reversed §103
Jun. 19, 2018 13/981,026 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 26, 2018 13/102,747 Affirmed §103
Jan. 31, 2018 13/978,087 Reversed §103
Dec. 26, 2017 14/193,353 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.