Examiner Ruiyun Zhang

Grant ratio: 62.4% (88th percentile in Art Unit 1782 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87448
Primary art unit
1782
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,166
Granted applications
728
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7934

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 31.0% 2.86
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.13 2,485 office actions across 1,166 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,162 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.3%
1 OA 453 38.9%
2 OAs 400 34.3%
3 OAs 145 12.4%
4 OAs 89 7.6%
5+ OAs 75 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 50.0% 2009 2011: 30.0% 2011 2012: 41.7% 2012 2013: 31.7% 2013 2014: 58.3% 2014 2015: 67.0% 2015 2016: 77.5% 2016 2017: 86.7% 2017 2018: 70.1% 2018 2019: 75.6% 2019 2020: 77.9% 2020 2021: 79.1% 2021 2022: 79.5% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 43.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20092150.0%
201130930.0%
2012482041.7%
2013632031.7%
2014724258.3%
2015916167.0%
2016806277.5%
2017837286.7%
2018775470.1%
2019826275.6%
2020776077.9%
2021866879.1%
2022735879.5%
2023725475.0%
2024705680.0%
2025662943.9%
20269400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,162 0.3% 13.3% 74.4% 8.8%
Action 2 709 0.0% 8.2% 80.4% 9.2%
Action 3 309 0.0% 5.2% 86.7% 4.2%
Action 4 164 0.0% 6.1% 86.6% 3.0%
Action 5 75 0.0% 4.0% 89.3% 4.0%
Action 6 38 0.0% 2.6% 89.5% 5.3%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.2% 1 of 468 office actions
All years 0.1% 3 of 2,485 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 28, 2017 13/762,571 Affirmed §103
Jun. 13, 2017 14/100,967 Reversed §103
Apr. 30, 2016 12/464,455 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 18, 2016 13/184,114 Affirmed §103
Oct. 17, 2014 12/114,275 Affirmed §103
Apr. 26, 2012 11/150,926 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.