Examiner Travis M Figg

Grant ratio: 50.2% (71st percentile in Art Unit 1783 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 50.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.62
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90909
Primary art unit
1783
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
444
Granted applications
223
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9849
Supervisor
Maria Veronica D. Ewald
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8519

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 37.0% 2.60
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.57 1,141 office actions across 444 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 441 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.7%
1 OA 131 29.5%
2 OAs 129 29.1%
3 OAs 87 19.6%
4 OAs 50 11.3%
5+ OAs 44 9.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 41.7% 2015 2016: 54.3% 2016 2017: 51.2% 2017 2018: 45.7% 2018 2019: 52.9% 2019 2020: 63.4% 2020 2021: 75.0% 2021 2022: 75.0% 2022 2023: 73.3% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 35.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014261350.0%
2015361541.7%
2016351954.3%
2017412151.2%
2018351645.7%
2019512752.9%
2020412663.4%
2021362775.0%
2022201575.0%
2023151173.3%
2024181688.9%
2025481735.4%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 441 0.0% 4.3% 91.8% 1.1%
Action 2 310 0.0% 4.2% 92.3% 2.3%
Action 3 181 0.0% 1.7% 95.6% 3.9%
Action 4 94 0.0% 1.1% 95.7% 3.2%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 33 0.0% 0.0% 97.0% 3.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 217 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,141 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 21, 2020 15/218,729 Affirmed §103
Jun. 10, 2020 15/336,249 Affirmed §103
Apr. 29, 2020 13/586,099 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 28, 2019 14/092,038 Reversed §103
Sep. 13, 2017 14/250,020 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
May. 12, 2017 13/849,891 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.