Examiner Ian Rummel

Grant ratio: 50.0% (47th percentile in Art Unit 1785 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.18. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 50.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.18
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87472
Primary art unit
1785
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
622
Granted applications
311
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5692
Supervisor
Mark Ruthkosky
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1291

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 42.8% 2.14
Group 212 36.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 1,348 office actions across 622 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 621 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 241 38.7%
2 OAs 214 34.4%
3 OAs 71 11.4%
4 OAs 51 8.2%
5+ OAs 44 7.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 14.3% 2011 2012: 15.0% 2012 2013: 34.1% 2013 2014: 38.3% 2014 2015: 62.5% 2015 2016: 45.8% 2016 2017: 55.9% 2017 2018: 62.9% 2018 2019: 63.4% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 91.2% 2021 2022: 60.0% 2022 2023: 73.5% 2023 2024: 82.8% 2024 2025: 32.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201135514.3%
201240615.0%
2013441534.1%
2014471838.3%
2015402562.5%
2016482245.8%
2017341955.9%
2018352262.9%
2019412663.4%
2020484083.3%
2021343191.2%
2022352160.0%
2023342573.5%
2024292482.8%
2025371232.4%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 621 0.0% 6.8% 91.3% 1.8%
Action 2 380 0.0% 3.9% 92.4% 3.2%
Action 3 166 0.0% 2.4% 94.0% 3.0%
Action 4 95 0.0% 1.1% 95.8% 1.1%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 188 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,348 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 4/14 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 6/14 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 1, 2022 13/397,470 Affirmed §103
Mar. 26, 2019 14/444,485 Reversed §103
Aug. 28, 2018 14/107,225 Reversed §103
Jan. 9, 2018 12/835,913 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 15, 2017 12/538,948 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 28, 2016 12/824,569 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Dec. 22, 2016 13/185,151 Reversed §103
Dec. 6, 2016 12/801,742 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 13, 2016 13/131,393 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2016 13/613,427 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 13, 2015 12/306,282 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2015 12/919,526 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.