Examiner Arti Singh-Pandey

Grant ratio: 62.3% (74th percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
75464
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
876
Granted applications
546
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1483
Supervisor
Duane Smith
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1166

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,508 office actions across 876 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 876 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 498 56.8%
2 OAs 222 25.3%
3 OAs 97 11.1%
4 OAs 36 4.1%
5+ OAs 23 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 59.3% 2008 2009: 62.8% 2009 2010: 77.4% 2010 2011: 61.1% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 61.1% 2013 2014: 57.9% 2014 2015: 42.6% 2015 2016: 70.7% 2016 2017: 81.6% 2017 2018: 80.3% 2018 2019: 79.7% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 85.3% 2021 2022: 87.2% 2022 2023: 67.6% 2023 2024: 88.6% 2024 2025: 31.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007221150.0%
2008271659.3%
2009784962.8%
2010624877.4%
2011181161.1%
2012600.0%
2013181161.1%
2014382257.9%
2015612642.6%
2016755370.7%
2017383181.6%
2018665380.3%
2019645179.7%
2020362775.0%
2021342985.3%
2022393487.2%
2023342367.6%
2024353188.6%
2025642031.3%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 876 0.7% 22.3% 61.4% 2.6%
Action 2 378 0.5% 19.0% 60.6% 5.8%
Action 3 156 0.0% 22.4% 59.6% 6.4%
Action 4 59 0.0% 22.0% 62.7% 3.4%
Action 5 23 0.0% 17.4% 60.9% 8.7%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 9.1%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 225 office actions
All years 0.5% 8 of 1,508 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
2014: Alice
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 29, 2013 11/654,335 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Sep. 27, 2011 10/309,360 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.