Examiner Dawn Garrett

Grant ratio: 65.6% (86th percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.42. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.42
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76107
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,036
Granted applications
680
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1523
Supervisor
Jennifer Boyd
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7783

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.47 2,564 office actions across 1,036 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,030 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.6%
1 OA 360 34.7%
2 OAs 290 28.0%
3 OAs 148 14.3%
4 OAs 118 11.4%
5+ OAs 114 11.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 47.1% 2008 2009: 67.1% 2009 2010: 76.6% 2010 2011: 65.6% 2011 2012: 76.2% 2012 2013: 73.8% 2013 2014: 73.7% 2014 2015: 80.4% 2015 2016: 75.5% 2016 2017: 70.5% 2017 2018: 70.0% 2018 2019: 81.8% 2019 2020: 83.0% 2020 2021: 78.6% 2021 2022: 75.6% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 74.3% 2024 2025: 37.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008703347.1%
2009734967.1%
2010644976.6%
2011644265.6%
2012634876.2%
2013614573.8%
2014574273.7%
2015564580.4%
2016534075.5%
2017443170.5%
2018503570.0%
2019443681.8%
2020473983.0%
2021423378.6%
2022453475.6%
2023453680.0%
2024352674.3%
2025451737.8%
20267800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,030 0.3% 4.9% 59.1% 10.7%
Action 2 670 0.3% 3.1% 65.2% 12.2%
Action 3 380 0.0% 3.2% 66.3% 13.2%
Action 4 232 0.0% 1.7% 68.5% 12.1%
Action 5 114 0.9% 2.6% 65.8% 13.2%
Action 6 59 0.0% 1.7% 67.8% 20.3%
Action 7 30 0.0% 3.3% 70.0% 16.7%
Action 8 17 0.0% 0.0% 82.4% 5.9%
Action 9 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 10 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 415 office actions
All years 0.2% 6 of 2,564 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2020 14/838,874 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 19, 2017 13/160,052 Affirmed §103
Jan. 19, 2017 13/147,186 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.