Examiner Jennifer A. Chriss

Grant ratio: 27.2% (30th percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 27.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.65
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79546
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
232
Granted applications
63
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7783
Supervisor
Sri Kumar
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7769

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.14 496 office actions across 232 applications
Applications with office actions 94.8% 220 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 5.2%
1 OA 72 31.0%
2 OAs 78 33.6%
3 OAs 29 12.5%
4 OAs 30 12.9%
5+ OAs 11 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 13.6% 2008 2009: 54.3% 2009 2010: 30.0% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 12.5% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2025: 27.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007800.0%
200844613.6%
2009703854.3%
2010401230.0%
2011700.0%
2012600.0%
2013900.0%
20148112.5%
2015700.0%
2017300.0%
20186350.0%
202511327.3%
20261300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 220 0.0% 10.9% 79.1% 0.9%
Action 2 148 0.0% 8.8% 79.7% 4.1%
Action 3 70 0.0% 7.1% 80.0% 8.6%
Action 4 41 0.0% 2.4% 78.0% 9.8%
Action 5 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 42 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 496 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 3, 2017 13/059,662 Reversed §102
Mar. 28, 2017 12/337,798 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 17, 2017 12/754,461 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 27, 2016 13/410,576 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 29, 2016 12/161,750 Affirmed §103
Jun. 19, 2015 12/329,013 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 11, 2013 11/748,681 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2010 11/178,762 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2010 10/830,634 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.