Examiner J. L. Yang

Grant ratio: 64.4% (78th percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.88
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86803
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
992
Granted applications
639
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1137
Supervisor
Jennifer A Boyd
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7783

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.98 2,952 office actions across 992 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 981 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 1.1%
1 OA 284 28.6%
2 OAs 224 22.6%
3 OAs 152 15.3%
4 OAs 140 14.1%
5+ OAs 181 18.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 52.2% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 36.1% 2012 2013: 30.6% 2013 2014: 78.9% 2014 2015: 80.0% 2015 2016: 84.6% 2016 2017: 88.5% 2017 2018: 71.7% 2018 2019: 77.2% 2019 2020: 77.8% 2020 2021: 81.6% 2021 2022: 80.0% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 73.1% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009900.0%
2010462452.2%
2011302066.7%
2012361336.1%
2013361130.6%
2014957578.9%
2015806480.0%
2016786684.6%
2017615488.5%
2018604371.7%
2019574477.2%
2020544277.8%
2021494081.6%
2022604880.0%
2023554480.0%
2024261973.1%
2025723244.4%
20268800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 981 0.1% 10.0% 74.4% 10.8%
Action 2 697 0.0% 7.3% 81.5% 8.9%
Action 3 473 0.0% 6.8% 78.0% 13.7%
Action 4 321 0.0% 6.9% 77.9% 12.5%
Action 5 181 0.0% 4.4% 80.1% 11.6%
Action 6 114 0.0% 3.5% 79.8% 13.2%
Action 7 66 0.0% 3.0% 86.4% 10.6%
Action 8 45 0.0% 2.2% 80.0% 17.8%
Action 9 24 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
Action 10 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 5.9%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 469 office actions
All years 0.0% 1 of 2,952 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 6, 2026 16/631,475 Affirmed §103
Sep. 30, 2024 15/453,309 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 4, 2023 16/781,288 Affirmed §103
Nov. 2, 2020 15/346,190 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2018 14/678,467 Reversed §103
Jul. 28, 2017 12/326,311 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2017 12/237,042 Reversed §103
Nov. 30, 2012 11/643,979 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.