Examiner Dylan Clay Kershner

Grant ratio: 48.1% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.1%
Average office actions / grant 3.75
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91937
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
345
Granted applications
166
Examiner phone
(303) 297-4257
Supervisor
Jennifer Boyd
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7783

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.21 1,106 office actions across 345 applications
Applications with office actions 96.8% 334 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 3.2%
1 OA 61 17.7%
2 OAs 78 22.6%
3 OAs 57 16.5%
4 OAs 72 20.9%
5+ OAs 66 19.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 33.3% 2016 2017: 32.1% 2017 2018: 39.1% 2018 2019: 19.2% 2019 2020: 66.7% 2020 2021: 75.8% 2021 2022: 78.6% 2022 2023: 80.8% 2023 2024: 89.7% 2024 2025: 60.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20132150.0%
201518950.0%
201615533.3%
201728932.1%
201823939.1%
201926519.2%
2020332266.7%
2021332575.8%
2022141178.6%
2023262180.8%
2024292689.7%
2025382360.5%
20266000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 334 0.0% 3.0% 61.4% 1.8%
Action 2 273 0.0% 1.5% 73.3% 5.1%
Action 3 195 0.0% 2.1% 71.8% 3.1%
Action 4 138 0.0% 2.9% 78.3% 3.6%
Action 5 66 0.0% 1.5% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 6 43 0.0% 2.3% 76.7% 4.7%
Action 7 28 0.0% 3.6% 78.6% 7.1%
Action 8 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 11.1% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 286 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,106 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 1, 2025 16/563,621 Affirmed §103
Oct. 23, 2018 13/508,263 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 23, 2018 15/165,142 Reversed N/A
Apr. 23, 2018 13/983,687 Reversed N/A
Aug. 9, 2016 11/658,772 Reversed §103
May. 6, 2016 13/001,645 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.