Examiner Rachel Simbana

Grant ratio: 32.0% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 1786 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 32.0%
Average office actions / grant 4.06
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
94935
Primary art unit
1786
Work group
1780
Technology center
1700
Applications
247
Granted applications
79
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2657
Supervisor
Jennifer Boyd
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7783

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 38.3% 3.24
Group 208 37.3% 2.71
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.70 914 office actions across 247 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 247 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 48 19.4%
2 OAs 59 23.9%
3 OAs 31 12.6%
4 OAs 28 11.3%
5+ OAs 81 32.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 63.6% 2020 2021: 33.3% 2021 2022: 58.3% 2022 2023: 58.8% 2023 2024: 56.8% 2024 2025: 35.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20192150.0%
202011763.6%
20219333.3%
202212758.3%
2023342058.8%
2024372156.8%
2025562035.7%
20268600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 247 0.4% 1.6% 68.8% 2.0%
Action 2 199 0.0% 3.0% 77.9% 2.5%
Action 3 140 0.0% 2.9% 75.7% 2.9%
Action 4 109 0.0% 1.8% 82.6% 4.6%
Action 5 81 0.0% 4.9% 80.2% 4.9%
Action 6 58 0.0% 3.4% 84.5% 3.4%
Action 7 36 0.0% 2.8% 83.3% 2.8%
Action 8 21 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 9 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.2% 1 of 511 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 914 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 3, 2025 16/542,805 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.