Examiner Ciel Thomas

Grant ratio: 47.6% (71st percentile in Art Unit 1794 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 47.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87394
Primary art unit
1794
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
847
Granted applications
403
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7946
Supervisor
James Lin
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8902

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 33 26.4% 1.85
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.27 1,979 office actions across 873 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 873 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 328 37.6%
2 OAs 270 30.9%
3 OAs 125 14.3%
4 OAs 82 9.4%
5+ OAs 68 7.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 13.3% 2011 2012: 17.5% 2012 2013: 35.8% 2013 2014: 39.5% 2014 2015: 21.1% 2015 2016: 63.6% 2016 2017: 63.1% 2017 2018: 69.4% 2018 2019: 66.2% 2019 2020: 54.5% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 73.0% 2022 2023: 59.1% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 31.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
201130413.3%
201240717.5%
2013531935.8%
2014431739.5%
201538821.1%
2016664263.6%
2017654163.1%
2018725069.4%
2019684566.2%
2020553054.5%
2021422866.7%
2022634673.0%
2023221359.1%
2024513466.7%
2025611931.1%
20267700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 873 1.0% 5.5% 70.2% 10.8%
Action 2 545 0.2% 5.7% 81.1% 7.3%
Action 3 275 0.4% 3.3% 85.1% 7.3%
Action 4 150 0.7% 1.3% 88.7% 7.3%
Action 5 68 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 10.3%
Action 6 32 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% 9.4%
Action 7 18 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 22.2%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 3 of 368 office actions
All years 0.6% 12 of 1,979 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.8%
0.6%
2019: PEG
1.2%
0.8%
0.0%
1.2%
6.1%
2024: AI examples
0.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 12, 2023 15/697,623 Affirmed §101 · §112
Mar. 18, 2022 16/045,863 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2018 14/023,577 Reversed §103
Jan. 13, 2017 12/062,269 Affirmed §103
Dec. 12, 2016 13/778,710 Affirmed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 12/618,403 Affirmed §103
Mar. 1, 2016 12/296,860 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 4, 2014 12/136,439 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 24, 2013 11/995,122 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.