Examiner Alex Noguerola

Grant ratio: 78.3% (91st percentile in Art Unit 1795 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.48
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
73022
Primary art unit
1795
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,570
Granted applications
1,229
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1343
Supervisor
Luan Van
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8521

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 39.8% 1.87
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.46 2,296 office actions across 1,570 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 1,558 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 0.8%
1 OA 1,047 66.7%
2 OAs 368 23.4%
3 OAs 88 5.6%
4 OAs 42 2.7%
5+ OAs 13 0.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.3% 2008 2009: 65.0% 2009 2010: 70.2% 2010 2011: 64.0% 2011 2012: 85.7% 2012 2013: 83.6% 2013 2014: 92.0% 2014 2015: 91.3% 2015 2016: 83.0% 2016 2017: 94.3% 2017 2018: 86.2% 2018 2019: 88.8% 2019 2020: 90.1% 2020 2021: 87.8% 2021 2022: 87.1% 2022 2023: 86.1% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 53.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008804961.3%
20091006565.0%
2010845970.2%
2011865564.0%
2012917885.7%
2013736183.6%
2014756992.0%
2015807391.3%
2016947883.0%
2017878294.3%
2018877586.2%
2019897988.8%
20201019190.1%
2021746587.8%
2022706187.1%
2023796886.1%
2024817288.9%
2025914953.8%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,558 0.3% 10.8% 44.7% 35.6%
Action 2 511 0.2% 6.5% 47.2% 34.4%
Action 3 143 0.7% 8.4% 60.1% 21.7%
Action 4 55 0.0% 7.3% 45.5% 38.2%
Action 5 13 7.7% 0.0% 61.5% 23.1%
Action 6 7 14.3% 0.0% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 309 office actions
All years 0.3% 8 of 2,296 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.9%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 19, 2025 17/346,144 Reversed §103
Apr. 30, 2025 17/373,515 Reversed §112
Sep. 9, 2021 16/289,933 Affirmed §103
Jul. 25, 2012 10/600,177 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.