Examiner Robert Hodge

Grant ratio: 38.7% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 1795 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.11. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 38.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.11
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80542
Primary art unit
1795
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
204
Granted applications
79
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2097
Supervisor
Boveja Namrata
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8105

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 39.8% 1.87
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 383 office actions across 204 applications
Applications with office actions 94.6% 193 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 5.4%
1 OA 86 42.2%
2 OAs 63 30.9%
3 OAs 20 9.8%
4 OAs 14 6.9%
5+ OAs 10 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 47.2% 2009 2010: 45.0% 2010 2011: 43.5% 2011 2012: 80.0% 2012 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 25.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008402050.0%
2009532547.2%
2010401845.0%
2011231043.5%
20125480.0%
2014200.0%
2015300.0%
20202500.0%
20258225.0%
2026500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 193 2.6% 9.8% 68.9% 1.6%
Action 2 107 0.0% 5.6% 75.7% 3.7%
Action 3 44 0.0% 2.3% 84.1% 0.0%
Action 4 24 0.0% 0.0% 79.2% 8.3%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 70.0% 0.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 18 office actions
All years 1.3% 5 of 383 office actions
Change -1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.8%
0.8%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 12, 2012 11/985,423 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 30, 2011 11/004,898 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 26, 2011 10/810,075 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 22, 2011 10/305,881 Reversed N/A
Jun. 16, 2011 10/664,822 Reversed N/A
Jun. 2, 2011 10/472,378 Affirmed §103
Feb. 16, 2011 10/622,881 Reversed §103
Oct. 28, 2010 10/273,094 Reversed §103
Oct. 5, 2010 10/609,683 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2010 10/978,981 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 28, 2010 10/374,980 Reversed N/A
Dec. 23, 2009 10/793,594 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.