Examiner Luan V. Van

Grant ratio: 33.4% (28th percentile in Art Unit 1795 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 33.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80904
Primary art unit
1795
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
461
Granted applications
154
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8521
Supervisor
Gregory Tryder
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7365

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 39.8% 1.87
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.83 842 office actions across 461 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 455 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.3%
1 OA 228 49.5%
2 OAs 145 31.5%
3 OAs 40 8.7%
4 OAs 21 4.6%
5+ OAs 21 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 14.5% 2008 2009: 31.0% 2009 2010: 40.8% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 35.9% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2020: 12.5% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 50.0% 2022 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 71.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200855814.5%
20091294031.0%
20101034240.8%
2011824150.0%
2012391435.9%
2013200.0%
2014300.0%
2015300.0%
201611100.0%
20208112.5%
2021400.0%
20224250.0%
2024200.0%
20257571.4%
20261900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 455 0.4% 2.0% 68.1% 4.0%
Action 2 227 0.0% 3.1% 82.8% 1.8%
Action 3 82 0.0% 1.2% 82.9% 4.9%
Action 4 42 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 4.8%
Action 5 21 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 70.0% 10.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 44 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 842 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 16, 2015 11/858,652 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 26, 2012 11/373,635 Affirmed §103
Jun. 26, 2012 10/494,908 Affirmed in part §103
May. 29, 2012 11/263,105 Reversed §103
Mar. 29, 2012 11/330,507 Reversed N/A
Apr. 15, 2011 11/049,774 Reversed §103
May. 21, 2010 11/008,098 Affirmed §103
Mar. 16, 2010 10/440,381 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.