AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jill Warden

Examiner Jill Warden appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 35.0%, they average 2.70 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.70
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Phone
(571) 272-1267
Predicted Supervisor
Jill A Warden
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1267
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
217
Granted Applications
76
Non-Granted Applications
141
Avg OA / Grant
2.70
Last OA Observed
December 2025 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1773 , 1797 , 1798
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 35.0% 2.70
Art Unit 28 50.5% 2.19
Group 307 37.1% 2.11
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 15 5 33.3%
2009 7 2 28.6%
2010 14 6 42.9%
2011 17 8 47.1%
2012 11 3 27.3%
2013 21 8 38.1%
2014 32 10 31.3%
2015 12 3 25.0%
2016 23 9 39.1%
2017 5 1 20.0%
2018 12 4 33.3%
2019 3 3 100.0%
No observed data for 2020.
2021 12 2 16.7%
2022 1 1 100.0%
2023 3 2 66.7%
2024 7 6 85.7%
2025 22 3 13.6%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

76 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 182 1.1% 11.5% 69.2% 9.3%
2 148 3.4% 11.5% 62.2% 14.2%
3 78 2.6% 7.7% 70.5% 11.5%
4 50 0.0% 12.0% 74.0% 10.0%
5 21 0.0% 9.5% 81.0% 9.5%
6 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 6.3%
7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
2.3%
2010
0.0%
2011
1.8%
2012
1.6%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
9.5%
2018
20.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
15.8%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.