Examiner Khanh Dang

Grant ratio: 61.7% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2111 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.90. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2017
Grant ratio 61.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.90
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
67770
Primary art unit
2111
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
452
Granted applications
279

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 16 59.5% 1.82
Group 218 62.9% 1.69
Tech Center 1,817 51.4% 2.19
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.02 913 office actions across 452 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 452 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 196 43.4%
2 OAs 143 31.6%
3 OAs 65 14.4%
4 OAs 26 5.8%
5+ OAs 22 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 62.5% 2008 2009: 67.2% 2009 2010: 70.8% 2010 2011: 60.8% 2011 2012: 51.2% 2012 2013: 60.0% 2013 2014: 48.5% 2014 2015: 65.1% 2015 2016: 72.1% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008322062.5%
2009674567.2%
2010483470.8%
2011513160.8%
2012412151.2%
2013603660.0%
2014663248.5%
2015432865.1%
2016433172.1%
201711100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 452 2.4% 12.6% 62.8% 11.7%
Action 2 256 3.5% 14.5% 62.9% 12.5%
Action 3 113 0.9% 8.8% 79.6% 6.2%
Action 4 48 4.2% 10.4% 72.9% 8.3%
Action 5 22 4.5% 4.5% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 70.0% 20.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 2.6% 24 of 913 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.2%
2.9%
4.1%
3.0%
0.8%
5.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
5.1%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
45.0% 9/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.0% 11/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 22, 2016 12/981,741 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Dec. 22, 2016 13/019,912 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 12/846,970 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 12/527,372 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 31, 2016 13/221,436 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 23, 2016 11/735,976 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Jan. 14, 2016 12/632,196 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 17, 2015 12/849,980 Reversed N/A
Dec. 11, 2015 13/418,804 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 23, 2015 12/304,327 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 27, 2015 13/208,749 Reversed N/A
Jun. 15, 2015 12/433,544 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.