AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tyler Dean Hedrick

Examiner Tyler Dean Hedrick appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 71.6%, they average 1.79 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.79
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2022-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5803
Predicted Supervisor
Thomas Lee
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3667
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2110 - Computer Error Control, Reliability, and Control Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
102
Granted Applications
73
Non-Granted Applications
29
Avg OA / Grant
1.79
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2115
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 71.6% 1.79
Art Unit 33 73.7% 1.51
Group 203 68.7% 1.68
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 2 2 100.0%
2023 33 30 90.9%
2024 27 24 88.9%
2025 31 17 54.8%
2026 9 0 0.0%

73 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 98 3.1% 9.2% 86.7% 0.0%
2 57 1.8% 7.0% 91.2% 0.0%
3 24 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
4 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2022
1.9%
2023
4.6%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.