Examiner Mohammed Rehman

Grant ratio: 77.4% (73rd percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.93
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82214
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
749
Granted applications
580
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1412
Supervisor
Jaweed Abbaszadeh
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1640

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.91 1,431 office actions across 749 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 746 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 328 43.8%
2 OAs 245 32.7%
3 OAs 110 14.7%
4 OAs 44 5.9%
5+ OAs 19 2.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 72.7% 2008 2009: 61.4% 2009 2010: 70.8% 2010 2011: 75.5% 2011 2012: 79.5% 2012 2013: 81.6% 2013 2014: 84.1% 2014 2015: 68.0% 2015 2016: 76.7% 2016 2017: 83.3% 2017 2018: 97.7% 2018 2019: 93.3% 2019 2020: 96.7% 2020 2021: 94.1% 2021 2022: 97.8% 2022 2023: 86.5% 2023 2024: 94.1% 2024 2025: 45.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008221672.7%
2009573561.4%
2010483470.8%
2011493775.5%
2012443579.5%
2013494081.6%
2014443784.1%
2015251768.0%
2016433376.7%
2017302583.3%
2018434297.7%
2019454293.3%
2020302996.7%
2021343294.1%
2022454497.8%
2023373286.5%
2024343294.1%
2025401845.0%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 746 0.9% 7.6% 84.9% 1.6%
Action 2 418 0.5% 5.7% 91.9% 0.0%
Action 3 173 0.6% 1.7% 96.0% 0.6%
Action 4 63 0.0% 1.6% 93.7% 0.0%
Action 5 19 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 191 office actions
All years 0.7% 10 of 1,431 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2014: Alice
1.5%
1.7%
0.0%
1.6%
1.2%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.0%
1.8%
1.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 11, 2019 14/595,780 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2018 14/296,007 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 9, 2016 12/685,841 Reversed N/A
Oct. 20, 2014 12/137,959 Affirmed in part N/A
Mar. 28, 2014 11/457,414 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.