Examiner Chad G Erdman

Grant ratio: 70.7% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.62
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91601
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
610
Granted applications
431
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0177
Supervisor
Kamini S. Shah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2279

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 1,041 office actions across 610 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 607 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 351 57.5%
2 OAs 152 24.9%
3 OAs 64 10.5%
4 OAs 20 3.3%
5+ OAs 20 3.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 90.0% 2014 2015: 73.3% 2015 2016: 80.4% 2016 2017: 82.6% 2017 2018: 73.3% 2018 2019: 75.5% 2019 2020: 79.4% 2020 2021: 87.7% 2021 2022: 77.6% 2022 2023: 86.8% 2023 2024: 83.0% 2024 2025: 37.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201410990.0%
2015302273.3%
2016463780.4%
2017463882.6%
2018453373.3%
2019493775.5%
2020635079.4%
2021575087.7%
2022584577.6%
2023534686.8%
2024534483.0%
2025532037.7%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 607 2.0% 4.3% 83.0% 7.7%
Action 2 256 1.6% 0.8% 91.0% 5.5%
Action 3 104 0.0% 1.0% 93.3% 2.9%
Action 4 40 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 5.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 5.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.3% 8 of 245 office actions
All years 1.5% 16 of 1,041 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
3.7%
2019: PEG
1.1%
0.9%
0.0%
1.1%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
3.9%
6.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 15, 2024 15/957,482 Affirmed §103
May. 30, 2023 15/413,199 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 1, 2022 14/205,397 Affirmed §103
Feb. 22, 2022 15/369,129 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.