Examiner Jigneshkumar C Patel

Grant ratio: 67.1% (41st percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.87. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.87
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92511
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
490
Granted applications
329
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0698
Supervisor
Kenneth M. Lo
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9774

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 876 office actions across 490 applications
Applications with office actions 96.7% 474 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 16 3.3%
1 OA 267 54.5%
2 OAs 123 25.1%
3 OAs 31 6.3%
4 OAs 27 5.5%
5+ OAs 26 5.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 54.5% 2015 2016: 62.5% 2016 2017: 73.5% 2017 2018: 68.9% 2018 2019: 68.4% 2019 2020: 82.7% 2020 2021: 84.2% 2021 2022: 82.9% 2022 2023: 90.2% 2023 2024: 83.7% 2024 2025: 51.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201511654.5%
2016402562.5%
2017342573.5%
2018453168.9%
2019382668.4%
2020524382.7%
2021383284.2%
2022413482.9%
2023413790.2%
2024494183.7%
2025562951.8%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 474 6.5% 12.4% 71.9% 4.0%
Action 2 207 4.8% 3.4% 82.6% 6.3%
Action 3 84 3.6% 0.0% 91.7% 2.4%
Action 4 53 0.0% 0.0% 96.2% 3.8%
Action 5 26 3.8% 0.0% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 6 18 5.6% 0.0% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 7 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 12.4% 26 of 209 office actions
All years 5.5% 48 of 876 office actions
Change +7.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
2.3%
1.2%
3.4%
8.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.1%
4.5%
1.6%
3.6%
2024: AI examples
5.9%
2025: August memo
20.9%
14.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2021 14/928,470 Affirmed §103
Jul. 2, 2021 14/111,220 Affirmed §103
Feb. 14, 2019 14/781,514 Reversed N/A
Dec. 12, 2018 13/968,773 Reversed §103
Jun. 26, 2018 13/701,886 Reversed §103
Apr. 26, 2017 13/817,901 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.