Examiner Istiaque Ahmed

Grant ratio: 56.7% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 56.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.34
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92971
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
224
Granted applications
127
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7087
Supervisor
Kamini Shah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2279

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 538 office actions across 224 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 222 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.9%
1 OA 97 43.3%
2 OAs 48 21.4%
3 OAs 31 13.8%
4 OAs 24 10.7%
5+ OAs 22 9.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 52.2% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 68.0% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 81.8% 2021 2022: 62.5% 2022 2023: 73.3% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 35.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2016200.0%
2017231252.2%
2018271866.7%
2019251768.0%
2020282175.0%
2021221881.8%
2022161062.5%
2023151173.3%
2024211466.7%
202517635.3%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 222 4.5% 5.4% 83.3% 4.5%
Action 2 125 3.2% 2.4% 89.6% 2.4%
Action 3 77 10.4% 2.6% 80.5% 6.5%
Action 4 46 15.2% 4.3% 76.1% 4.3%
Action 5 22 18.2% 0.0% 72.7% 9.1%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 14.7% 20 of 136 office actions
All years 6.1% 33 of 538 office actions
Change +8.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.7%
11.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
2.7%
9.8%
2024: AI examples
22.0%
2025: August memo
7.9%
11.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
3.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 17, 2026 17/147,199 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 21, 2021 15/281,633 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.