Examiner Tanh Nguyen

Grant ratio: 52.8% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 2118 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2021
Grant ratio 52.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76697
Primary art unit
2118
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
339
Granted applications
179

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 48.9% 1.74
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.98 1,009 office actions across 339 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 339 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 87 25.7%
2 OAs 92 27.1%
3 OAs 52 15.3%
4 OAs 46 13.6%
5+ OAs 62 18.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 79.2% 2008 2009: 37.9% 2009 2010: 42.3% 2010 2011: 24.2% 2011 2012: 51.9% 2012 2013: 60.6% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 45.0% 2015 2016: 37.5% 2016 2017: 58.3% 2017 2018: 42.9% 2018 2019: 77.3% 2019 2020: 80.0% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241979.2%
2009291137.9%
2010261142.3%
201133824.2%
2012271451.9%
2013332060.6%
2014332266.7%
201520945.0%
2016321237.5%
201712758.3%
201821942.9%
2019221777.3%
2020151280.0%
202112866.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 339 2.4% 8.8% 54.6% 13.0%
Action 2 252 0.8% 8.7% 58.3% 16.7%
Action 3 160 0.6% 8.1% 69.4% 16.3%
Action 4 108 0.0% 2.8% 70.4% 17.6%
Action 5 62 0.0% 0.0% 69.4% 22.6%
Action 6 40 0.0% 0.0% 67.5% 22.5%
Action 7 24 0.0% 4.2% 54.2% 29.2%
Action 8 14 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 42.9%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 28.6%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.1% 11 of 1,009 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
2.3%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 1, 2021 14/066,901 Reversed §103
Feb. 7, 2020 14/751,989 Affirmed in part §112 · §120
Aug. 23, 2016 13/903,378 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 22, 2016 13/040,748 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 24, 2016 12/605,707 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 19, 2014 12/353,019 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2014 11/971,324 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 7, 2014 10/667,029 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 1, 2013 11/561,512 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.