Examiner Austin Hicks

Grant ratio: 61.8% (58th percentile in Art Unit 2118 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.32. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.32
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88484
Primary art unit
2118
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
468
Granted applications
289
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3377
Supervisor
Miranda Huang
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7092

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 48.9% 1.74
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.28 1,081 office actions across 475 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 475 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 191 40.2%
2 OAs 137 28.8%
3 OAs 65 13.7%
4 OAs 41 8.6%
5+ OAs 41 8.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 75.0% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 42.4% 2014 2015: 81.5% 2015 2016: 65.4% 2016 2017: 72.5% 2017 2018: 79.2% 2018 2019: 89.4% 2019 2020: 89.3% 2020 2024: 65.4% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20128675.0%
2013201575.0%
2014331442.4%
2015272281.5%
2016261765.4%
2017513772.5%
2018725779.2%
2019665989.4%
2020282589.3%
2024261765.4%
2025502040.0%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 475 1.1% 11.6% 84.2% 2.1%
Action 2 284 2.1% 8.5% 86.3% 3.2%
Action 3 147 2.0% 6.1% 88.4% 2.7%
Action 4 82 2.4% 3.7% 93.9% 0.0%
Action 5 41 2.4% 7.3% 90.2% 0.0%
Action 6 25 8.0% 0.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 7 15 13.3% 0.0% 86.7% 0.0%
Action 8 8 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.1% 11 of 271 office actions
All years 2.1% 23 of 1,081 office actions
Change +1.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.3%
1.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
2.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.7%
2025: August memo
2.6%
7.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
45.5% 5/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 23, 2026 17/563,314 Reversed §103
Feb. 25, 2026 17/391,347 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101
Nov. 2, 2021 15/417,758 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 3, 2021 15/137,660 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 1, 2019 14/312,813 Reversed §103 · §120
Jun. 17, 2019 13/711,896 Affirmed §103
Apr. 18, 2016 12/241,354 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 1, 2016 11/915,488 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 16, 2016 13/444,603 Reversed §103 · §112
Jan. 4, 2016 12/940,639 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 28, 2015 12/825,577 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.