Examiner Sean Shechtman

Grant ratio: 70.0% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2121 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79643
Primary art unit
2121
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
908
Granted applications
636
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3754
Supervisor
William Kraig
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8660

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 39.5% 2.16
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.07 1,877 office actions across 908 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 908 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 406 44.7%
2 OAs 260 28.6%
3 OAs 118 13.0%
4 OAs 74 8.1%
5+ OAs 50 5.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.6% 2008 2009: 70.9% 2009 2010: 71.4% 2010 2011: 72.0% 2011 2012: 64.1% 2012 2013: 83.3% 2013 2014: 73.8% 2014 2015: 81.8% 2015 2016: 87.1% 2016 2017: 57.1% 2017 2018: 63.6% 2018 2019: 68.4% 2019 2020: 82.4% 2020 2021: 76.2% 2021 2022: 89.2% 2022 2023: 82.1% 2023 2024: 70.6% 2024 2025: 52.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008614065.6%
2009553970.9%
2010564071.4%
2011503672.0%
2012644164.1%
2013786583.3%
2014614573.8%
2015665481.8%
2016625487.1%
2017352057.1%
2018332163.6%
2019382668.4%
2020342882.4%
2021211676.2%
2022373389.2%
2023282382.1%
2024342470.6%
2025593152.5%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 908 6.5% 22.2% 57.0% 6.1%
Action 2 502 5.2% 15.1% 71.3% 3.6%
Action 3 242 5.4% 16.5% 69.0% 3.3%
Action 4 124 4.0% 16.9% 73.4% 1.6%
Action 5 50 2.0% 8.0% 88.0% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 7.4% 85.2% 0.0%
Action 7 10 10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 18.8% 42 of 223 office actions
All years 5.6% 106 of 1,877 office actions
Change +13.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.6%
0.0%
1.7%
1.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.6%
1.7%
2.2%
11.4%
18.2%
2019: PEG
8.2%
10.7%
10.5%
11.3%
27.3%
2024: AI examples
13.6%
2025: August memo
16.3%
29.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 9, 2019 13/730,322 Affirmed §103
Jul. 31, 2018 13/753,835 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 12/774,473 Affirmed §102
Sep. 26, 2016 12/621,113 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 13, 2016 12/628,624 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 16, 2016 12/985,807 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 30, 2014 11/955,196 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.