Examiner Wilbert L Starks

Grant ratio: 68.6% (81st percentile in Art Unit 2122 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
75023
Primary art unit
2122
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
726
Granted applications
498
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3691
Supervisor
David R. Vincent
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3080

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 37.0% 2.00
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,378 office actions across 743 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 743 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 406 54.6%
2 OAs 179 24.1%
3 OAs 82 11.0%
4 OAs 42 5.7%
5+ OAs 34 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 79.2% 2008 2009: 80.0% 2009 2010: 80.6% 2010 2011: 79.4% 2011 2012: 71.0% 2012 2013: 77.8% 2013 2014: 83.3% 2014 2015: 83.3% 2015 2016: 76.5% 2016 2017: 25.0% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 97.1% 2019 2020: 97.3% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 75.0% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 55.6% 2024 2025: 14.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008483879.2%
2009352880.0%
2010675480.6%
2011342779.4%
2012312271.0%
2013272177.8%
2014302583.3%
2015363083.3%
2016342676.5%
201728725.0%
2018926975.0%
2019353497.1%
2020373697.3%
202112866.7%
2022443375.0%
2023242187.5%
2024271555.6%
202528414.3%
20265700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 743 18.2% 51.3% 17.9% 1.6%
Action 2 337 37.4% 40.9% 15.4% 2.4%
Action 3 158 49.4% 29.1% 15.8% 4.4%
Action 4 76 52.6% 25.0% 19.7% 0.0%
Action 5 34 47.1% 29.4% 20.6% 2.9%
Action 6 15 46.7% 26.7% 20.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 44.4% 22.2% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 8 5 60.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 54.5% 152 of 279 office actions
All years 29.8% 410 of 1,378 office actions
Change +24.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

9.4%
17.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
2014: Alice
5.6%
9.9%
8.1%
31.3%
57.5%
2019: PEG
20.4%
23.7%
32.5%
41.7%
39.4%
2024: AI examples
44.4%
2025: August memo
57.4%
69.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 20, 2024 15/645,719 Affirmed §101
Jan. 12, 2021 14/031,256 Reversed §102
Mar. 30, 2020 14/150,735 Affirmed §101
Nov. 22, 2019 14/795,614 Affirmed §101 · §102
Oct. 28, 2015 12/456,856 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 16, 2011 11/261,277 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.