AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Brian M Smith

Examiner Brian M Smith appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 40.2%, they average 2.83 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.83
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(469) 295-9104
Predicted Supervisor
Kakali Chaki
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3719
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
271
Granted Applications
109
Non-Granted Applications
162
Avg OA / Grant
2.83
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2122
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 40.2% 2.83
Art Unit 34 40.2% 1.96
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 9 4 44.4%
2017 25 2 8.0%
2018 24 9 37.5%
2019 30 17 56.7%
2020 28 16 57.1%
2021 31 21 67.7%
2022 11 8 72.7%
2023 37 18 48.6%
2024 13 9 69.2%
2025 48 5 10.4%
2026 15 0 0.0%

109 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 219 2.7% 4.6% 71.7% 3.2%
2 194 11.3% 7.2% 69.1% 5.7%
3 126 11.9% 3.2% 73.0% 3.2%
4 90 8.9% 1.1% 78.9% 6.7%
5 41 7.3% 0.0% 90.2% 0.0%
6 32 3.1% 0.0% 90.6% 0.0%
7 10 20.0% 0.0% 70.0% 10.0%
8 4 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
9 3 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3%
10 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
5.2%
2016
12.6%
2017
15.0%
2018
6.5%
2019
6.9%
2020
3.8%
2021
16.7%
2022
6.9%
2023
5.1%
2024
12.5%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.