Examiner Kevin L. Smith

Grant ratio: 23.2% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2122 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.50. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 23.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.50
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
94590
Primary art unit
2122
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
190
Granted applications
44
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5964
Supervisor
Hyung S Sough
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6799

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 37.0% 2.00
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.31 629 office actions across 190 applications
Applications with office actions 97.4% 185 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 2.6%
1 OA 43 22.6%
2 OAs 30 15.8%
3 OAs 25 13.2%
4 OAs 40 21.1%
5+ OAs 47 24.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 36.4% 2020 2021: 52.2% 2021 2022: 50.0% 2022 2023: 31.8% 2023 2024: 8.3% 2024 2025: 14.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20194250.0%
202011436.4%
2021231252.2%
2022261350.0%
202322731.8%
20242428.3%
202528414.3%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 185 4.9% 7.0% 85.4% 1.6%
Action 2 142 26.1% 7.0% 61.3% 5.6%
Action 3 112 28.6% 4.5% 61.6% 4.5%
Action 4 87 27.6% 6.9% 58.6% 5.7%
Action 5 47 23.4% 2.1% 68.1% 0.0%
Action 6 32 25.0% 6.3% 65.6% 0.0%
Action 7 13 69.2% 0.0% 30.8% 0.0%
Action 8 7 42.9% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 30.8% 85 of 276 office actions
All years 21.1% 133 of 629 office actions
Change +9.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2019: PEG
0.0%
8.0%
9.7%
15.5%
35.1%
2024: AI examples
36.2%
2025: August memo
27.7%
26.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 6/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 6/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 15, 2026 17/102,857 Reversed §101
May. 15, 2026 17/929,470 Affirmed §101
Mar. 27, 2026 18/168,123 Reversed §101
Nov. 20, 2025 17/704,721 Reversed §101
Aug. 26, 2025 15/290,858 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 29, 2025 16/424,371 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 17, 2025 15/557,641 Reversed N/A
Feb. 21, 2025 16/785,044 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 16, 2022 15/443,547 Affirmed §103
Jun. 2, 2022 15/343,458 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.