Examiner Ying Yu Chen

Grant ratio: 74.5% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2125 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2023
Grant ratio 74.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.35
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93557
Primary art unit
2125
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
212
Granted applications
158

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 33 44.1% 1.84
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.38 505 office actions across 212 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 212 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 73 34.4%
2 OAs 60 28.3%
3 OAs 34 16.0%
4 OAs 29 13.7%
5+ OAs 16 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 44.0% 2018 2019: 76.5% 2019 2020: 87.0% 2020 2021: 59.5% 2021 2022: 92.1% 2022 2023: 78.6% 2023

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20175360.0%
2018251144.0%
2019342676.5%
2020544787.0%
2021422559.5%
2022383592.1%
2023141178.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 212 7.1% 2.8% 84.4% 5.2%
Action 2 139 20.9% 5.0% 64.7% 6.5%
Action 3 79 15.2% 1.3% 70.9% 8.9%
Action 4 45 8.9% 2.2% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 5 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 6.3%
Action 6 8 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
Action 8 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 26.7% 4 of 15 office actions
All years 12.9% 65 of 505 office actions
Change +13.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

9.1%
24.0%
2019: PEG
3.2%
2.9%
16.9%
15.9%
27.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 11, 2024 15/819,748 Affirmed in part §101 · §103
Dec. 16, 2022 15/184,887 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Aug. 5, 2022 14/816,999 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Jun. 28, 2022 14/853,973 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2022 14/921,682 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §112 · §120
Dec. 31, 2020 14/573,240 Reversed §103
Feb. 26, 2020 14/497,645 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.