AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jennifer L. Norton

Examiner Jennifer L. Norton appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 46.0%, they average 2.68 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.68
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3694
Predicted Supervisor
Robert Fennema
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2748
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
637
Granted Applications
293
Non-Granted Applications
344
Avg OA / Grant
2.68
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2117 , 2118 , 2121 , 2126 , 2127
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 46.0% 2.68
Art Unit 31 68.2% 1.86
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 21 2 9.5%
2009 26 6 23.1%
2010 43 18 41.9%
2011 30 15 50.0%
2012 41 21 51.2%
2013 32 23 71.9%
2014 33 19 57.6%
2015 25 14 56.0%
2016 25 10 40.0%
2017 41 18 43.9%
2018 45 24 53.3%
2019 44 33 75.0%
2020 43 38 88.4%
2021 25 20 80.0%
2022 20 7 35.0%
2023 34 13 38.2%
2024 36 8 22.2%
2025 38 4 10.5%
2026 35 0 0.0%

293 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 619 14.1% 5.3% 67.7% 10.0%
2 434 12.2% 2.1% 71.9% 12.0%
3 261 11.1% 1.5% 74.3% 11.1%
4 167 12.0% 1.2% 74.9% 10.8%
5 80 6.3% 0.0% 80.0% 11.3%
6 46 10.9% 0.0% 71.7% 17.4%
7 20 10.0% 0.0% 60.0% 30.0%
8 14 7.1% 0.0% 71.4% 21.4%
9 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
10 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
1.4%
2015
1.1%
2016
11.2%
2017
27.6%
2018
3.8%
2019
8.2%
2020
21.3%
2021
28.0%
2022
29.8%
2023
40.7%
2024
32.7%
2025
17.1%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.