AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sivalingam Sivanesan

Appears inactive Last observed office action: October 2018 (90 months ago).

Examiner Sivalingam Sivanesan appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 72.9%, they average 1.73 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.73
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
10 years (2009-2018)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
251
Granted Applications
183
Non-Granted Applications
68
Avg OA / Grant
1.73
Last OA Observed
October 2018 (90 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2116 , 2121 , 2122 , 2125 , 2126 , 2127
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 72.9% 1.73
Art Unit 27 53.9% 1.95
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 24 15 62.5%
2010 37 27 73.0%
2011 41 32 78.0%
2012 29 18 62.1%
2013 28 21 75.0%
2014 27 21 77.8%
2015 31 22 71.0%
2016 14 12 85.7%
2017 13 11 84.6%
2018 7 4 57.1%
No observed data after 2018; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

183 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 262 3.8% 13.4% 73.3% 6.5%
2 134 2.2% 9.7% 76.9% 6.7%
3 47 2.1% 14.9% 72.3% 10.6%
4 22 4.5% 13.6% 81.8% 0.0%
5 6 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
8.8%
2010
6.3%
2011
0.0%
2012
1.8%
2013
1.8%
2014
2.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
2.6%
2017
6.3%
2018

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.