AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner William Paul Plefka

Appears inactive Last observed office action: February 2025 (15 months ago).

Examiner William Paul Plefka appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 22.2%, they average 2.25 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.25
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
3 years (2023-2025)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
18
Granted Applications
4
Non-Granted Applications
14
Avg OA / Grant
2.25
Last OA Observed
February 2025 (15 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2127
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 22.2% 2.25
Art Unit 27 53.9% 1.95
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2023; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2023 2 1 50.0%
2024 15 3 20.0%
2025 1 0 0.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

4 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 32 9.4% 0.0% 90.6% 0.0%
2 22 4.5% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
3 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
12.5%
2023
5.8%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.