Examiner Herng-Der Day

Grant ratio: 60.9% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2128 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2018
Grant ratio 60.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79387
Primary art unit
2128
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
256
Granted applications
156

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 44.9% 2.19
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.45 698 office actions across 285 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 285 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 110 38.6%
2 OAs 70 24.6%
3 OAs 48 16.8%
4 OAs 27 9.5%
5+ OAs 30 10.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 47.8% 2008 2009: 70.0% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 63.0% 2011 2012: 56.3% 2012 2013: 68.8% 2013 2014: 57.9% 2014 2015: 69.6% 2015 2016: 56.0% 2016 2017: 53.3% 2017 2018: 56.3% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008231147.8%
2009201470.0%
2010241666.7%
2011271763.0%
2012321856.3%
2013322268.8%
2014191157.9%
2015231669.6%
2016251456.0%
201715853.3%
201816956.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 285 17.9% 20.0% 38.6% 21.8%
Action 2 175 22.9% 35.4% 18.3% 23.4%
Action 3 105 15.2% 16.2% 29.5% 38.1%
Action 4 57 7.0% 12.3% 43.9% 35.1%
Action 5 30 20.0% 13.3% 43.3% 23.3%
Action 6 19 15.8% 5.3% 52.6% 26.3%
Action 7 12 0.0% 16.7% 75.0% 8.3%
Action 8 8 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 17.3% 121 of 698 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

11.9%
18.9%
8.8%
6.4%
16.0%
22.4%
2014: Alice
20.0%
12.1%
21.1%
26.8%
30.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 10, 2020 13/974,301 Affirmed §101 · §112
Aug. 14, 2020 13/338,374 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Mar. 12, 2020 14/166,581 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 29, 2018 14/692,474 Reversed §103
Dec. 15, 2016 12/775,392 Affirmed §103
Dec. 29, 2015 12/393,358 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 5, 2015 10/716,386 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 29, 2014 11/296,781 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.