Examiner Oluwatosin Alabi

Grant ratio: 42.7% (29th percentile in Art Unit 2129 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 42.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.62
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93580
Primary art unit
2129
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
253
Granted applications
108
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0516
Supervisor
Michael Huntley
Supervisor phone
(303) 297-4307

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 54.2% 1.89
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.45 620 office actions across 253 applications
Applications with office actions 92.9% 235 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 18 7.1%
1 OA 83 32.8%
2 OAs 63 24.9%
3 OAs 24 9.5%
4 OAs 30 11.9%
5+ OAs 35 13.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 25.0% 2017 2018: 45.0% 2018 2019: 42.9% 2019 2020: 34.8% 2020 2021: 76.0% 2021 2022: 62.9% 2022 2023: 66.7% 2023 2024: 61.1% 2024 2025: 31.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20178225.0%
201820945.0%
201921942.9%
202023834.8%
2021251976.0%
2022352262.9%
2023271866.7%
2024181161.1%
2025321031.3%
20264400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 235 0.9% 10.6% 82.6% 2.1%
Action 2 152 2.6% 9.2% 85.5% 2.0%
Action 3 89 0.0% 4.5% 94.4% 1.1%
Action 4 65 0.0% 1.5% 92.3% 4.6%
Action 5 35 0.0% 5.7% 91.4% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 90.5% 4.8%
Action 7 8 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 16.7% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.6% 3 of 187 office actions
All years 1.3% 8 of 620 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2019: PEG
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.9%
2024: AI examples
6.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
0.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 11, 2026 16/993,987 Reversed §101
Apr. 30, 2024 16/542,332 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 19, 2022 16/255,109 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 14, 2021 14/729,559 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 14, 2021 14/729,554 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 30, 2021 14/734,495 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 30, 2021 14/734,498 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.