Examiner Leandro Villanueva

Grant ratio: 48.3% (10th percentile in Art Unit 2131 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.46. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 48.3%
Average office actions / grant 4.46
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90434
Primary art unit
2131
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
118
Granted applications
57

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 9 58.4% 2.16
Group 138 68.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.74 523 office actions across 140 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 140 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 23 16.4%
2 OAs 30 21.4%
3 OAs 27 19.3%
4 OAs 23 16.4%
5+ OAs 37 26.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 100.0% 2013 2014: 23.1% 2014 2015: 43.8% 2015 2016: 53.3% 2016 2017: 36.8% 2017 2018: 28.6% 2018 2019: 52.4% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201322100.0%
201413323.1%
201516743.8%
201615853.3%
201719736.8%
201814428.6%
2019211152.4%
2020181583.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 140 0.0% 13.6% 86.4% 0.0%
Action 2 117 1.7% 10.3% 87.2% 0.9%
Action 3 87 0.0% 2.3% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 4 60 0.0% 1.7% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 5 37 0.0% 0.0% 97.3% 0.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 2 of 523 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 24, 2022 16/114,222 Reversed N/A
Sep. 30, 2021 15/427,421 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2021 14/449,689 Reversed §103
Aug. 21, 2019 14/450,437 Reversed §103
Jul. 18, 2018 13/670,009 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Apr. 12, 2018 13/616,701 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 27, 2018 13/917,240 Reversed §103
Mar. 27, 2018 13/917,906 Reversed §103
May. 16, 2017 13/524,468 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2016 13/842,520 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2016 13/367,155 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.