Examiner Daniel Tsui

Grant ratio: 85.7% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2132 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 85.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.72
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82169
Primary art unit
2132
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
504
Granted applications
432
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3253
Supervisor
Hosain Alam
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3978

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 72.2% 2.06
Group 138 68.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 853 office actions across 504 applications
Applications with office actions 97.0% 489 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 15 3.0%
1 OA 276 54.8%
2 OAs 129 25.6%
3 OAs 43 8.5%
4 OAs 22 4.4%
5+ OAs 19 3.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 80.0% 2011 2012: 61.5% 2012 2013: 74.2% 2013 2014: 81.4% 2014 2015: 90.2% 2015 2016: 95.3% 2016 2017: 92.9% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2019: 94.4% 2019 2020: 96.6% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 97.1% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011151280.0%
2012261661.5%
2013312374.2%
2014433581.4%
2015413790.2%
2016434195.3%
2017282692.9%
20182323100.0%
2019363494.4%
2020292896.6%
20213333100.0%
20223434100.0%
20233939100.0%
2024343397.1%
2025331854.5%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 489 2.5% 11.0% 71.4% 4.3%
Action 2 213 2.8% 6.6% 79.8% 6.6%
Action 3 84 0.0% 2.4% 94.0% 2.4%
Action 4 41 0.0% 2.4% 95.1% 0.0%
Action 5 19 5.3% 0.0% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.6% 2 of 125 office actions
All years 2.2% 19 of 853 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.7%
2.2%
2.4%
2014: Alice
4.1%
2.9%
1.3%
9.3%
2.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
2.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 23, 2020 14/930,703 Affirmed §103
Nov. 8, 2017 12/712,186 Reversed §103
Nov. 23, 2016 13/530,169 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 30, 2016 13/290,702 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2015 12/965,457 Reversed N/A
Apr. 30, 2015 12/275,472 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.