Examiner Hal Schnee

Grant ratio: 78.9% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2132 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.58. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.58
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83620
Primary art unit
2132
Work group
2120
Technology center
2100
Applications
611
Granted applications
482
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1918
Supervisor
Michael Huntley
Supervisor phone
(303) 297-4307

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 72.2% 2.06
Group 333 45.2% 1.98
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 1,016 office actions across 611 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 604 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.1%
1 OA 374 61.2%
2 OAs 137 22.4%
3 OAs 45 7.4%
4 OAs 29 4.7%
5+ OAs 19 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 77.8% 2011 2012: 85.1% 2012 2013: 90.2% 2013 2014: 89.2% 2014 2015: 86.5% 2015 2016: 86.0% 2016 2017: 86.3% 2017 2018: 84.4% 2018 2019: 69.0% 2019 2020: 82.0% 2020 2021: 88.2% 2021 2022: 82.9% 2022 2023: 93.8% 2023 2024: 92.3% 2024 2025: 55.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2011362877.8%
2012474085.1%
2013514690.2%
2014373389.2%
2015373286.5%
2016433786.0%
2017514486.3%
2018322784.4%
2019422969.0%
2020504182.0%
2021514588.2%
2022352982.9%
2023161593.8%
2024131292.3%
2025432455.8%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 604 4.1% 3.8% 68.2% 18.7%
Action 2 230 12.6% 4.3% 34.3% 47.8%
Action 3 93 2.2% 2.2% 58.1% 37.6%
Action 4 48 0.0% 0.0% 56.3% 41.7%
Action 5 19 0.0% 0.0% 63.2% 26.3%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 69.2% 30.8%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 9.9% 12 of 121 office actions
All years 5.5% 56 of 1,016 office actions
Change +4.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.6%
6.4%
2.5%
2014: Alice
2.7%
1.3%
2.5%
0.0%
4.5%
2019: PEG
8.1%
8.6%
4.7%
19.1%
5.6%
2024: AI examples
11.1%
2025: August memo
13.1%
3.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 21, 2018 12/746,719 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 15, 2015 12/284,332 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 10, 2014 12/286,959 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 5, 2014 11/773,321 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.