Examiner Jasmine Song

Grant ratio: 90.3% (96th percentile in Art Unit 2133 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.42. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 90.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.42
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77922
Primary art unit
2133
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
1,029
Granted applications
929
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4213

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 67.2% 1.93
Group 138 68.4% 2.08
Tech Center 1,807 51.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.44 1,483 office actions across 1,029 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,029 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 730 70.9%
2 OAs 210 20.4%
3 OAs 56 5.4%
4 OAs 14 1.4%
5+ OAs 19 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 83.0% 2008 2009: 87.9% 2009 2010: 98.5% 2010 2011: 93.5% 2011 2012: 94.4% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 96.7% 2014 2015: 87.2% 2015 2016: 89.5% 2016 2017: 95.1% 2017 2018: 96.6% 2018 2019: 98.4% 2019 2020: 98.3% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 96.6% 2022 2023: 96.2% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 51.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008473983.0%
2009585187.9%
2010666598.5%
2011625893.5%
2012545194.4%
2013574884.2%
2014605896.7%
2015474187.2%
2016575189.5%
2017615895.1%
2018595796.6%
2019626198.4%
2020605998.3%
20215151100.0%
2022585696.6%
2023525096.2%
20245454100.0%
2025412151.2%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,029 0.8% 52.4% 36.2% 0.9%
Action 2 299 0.7% 37.5% 52.8% 3.0%
Action 3 89 0.0% 25.8% 71.9% 1.1%
Action 4 33 0.0% 15.2% 81.8% 3.0%
Action 5 19 0.0% 10.5% 84.2% 5.3%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 165 office actions
All years 0.7% 10 of 1,483 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.7%
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.2%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 4/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 26, 2023 17/068,713 Reversed §103
Aug. 18, 2022 15/789,424 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 28, 2016 12/563,712 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 21, 2015 12/685,477 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.