Examiner Midys Rojas

Grant ratio: 83.4% (65th percentile in Art Unit 2133 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.77
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79649
Primary art unit
2133
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
844
Granted applications
704
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4207
Supervisor
Rocio Del Mar Perez-Velez
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5935

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 67.7% 1.93
Group 138 68.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,498 office actions across 844 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 843 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 458 54.3%
2 OAs 229 27.1%
3 OAs 92 10.9%
4 OAs 35 4.1%
5+ OAs 29 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 51.6% 2008 2009: 48.6% 2009 2010: 67.4% 2010 2011: 84.7% 2011 2012: 91.2% 2012 2013: 92.8% 2013 2014: 93.8% 2014 2015: 95.1% 2015 2016: 84.6% 2016 2017: 83.8% 2017 2018: 81.0% 2018 2019: 97.9% 2019 2020: 90.5% 2020 2021: 97.3% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 97.8% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 57.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008311651.6%
2009351748.6%
2010432967.4%
2011595084.7%
2012575291.2%
2013696492.8%
2014646093.8%
2015413995.1%
2016393384.6%
2017373183.8%
2018423481.0%
2019474697.9%
2020423890.5%
2021373697.3%
20225454100.0%
2023464597.8%
20244545100.0%
2025261557.7%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 843 1.1% 35.5% 41.8% 7.4%
Action 2 385 0.3% 23.9% 68.3% 6.8%
Action 3 156 1.3% 11.5% 79.5% 4.5%
Action 4 64 0.0% 7.8% 82.8% 7.8%
Action 5 29 0.0% 10.3% 86.2% 0.0%
Action 6 15 6.7% 13.3% 66.7% 6.7%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.9% 3 of 162 office actions
All years 0.9% 13 of 1,498 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
3.8%
2014: Alice
2.2%
1.6%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
8.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
77.8% 7/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 17, 2015 12/049,928 Reversed N/A
Dec. 17, 2014 10/116,490 Reversed §103
Jan. 31, 2014 11/154,401 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 23, 2013 11/654,456 Affirmed §102
Mar. 26, 2013 11/413,127 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 11, 2013 11/251,867 Affirmed in part §103
May. 25, 2012 10/929,321 Reversed §103
Nov. 21, 2011 11/030,937 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 17, 2011 11/005,381 Affirmed §101

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.