AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Yong Choe At Telephone Number 571-270-1053 Or Email To Yong.Choe@Uspto.Gov. The Examiner Can Normally Be Reached On M-F 10:00 Am To 6:30Pm. If Attempts To Reach The Examiner By Telephone Are Unsuccessful, The Examiner’S Supervisor, Sanjiv Shah Can Be Reached On 571-272-4098. Any Inquiry Of A General Nature Or Relating To The Status Of This Application Should Be Directed To The Tc 2100

Examiner Yong Choe At Telephone Number 571-270-1053 Or Email To Yong.Choe@Uspto.Gov. The Examiner Can Normally Be Reached On M-F 10:00 Am To 6:30Pm. If Attempts To Reach The Examiner By Telephone Are Unsuccessful, The Examiner’S Supervisor, Sanjiv Shah Can Be Reached On 571-272-4098. Any Inquiry Of A General Nature Or Relating To The Status Of This Application Should Be Directed To The Tc 2100 appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 89.0%, they average 1.55 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.55
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2100
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2130 - Memory Access and Control

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
893
Granted Applications
795
Non-Granted Applications
98
Avg OA / Grant
1.55
Last OA Observed
February 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2135 , 2185
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 89.0% 1.55
Art Unit 18 69.6% 2.01
Group 138 69.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 32 22 68.8%
2009 43 32 74.4%
2010 32 28 87.5%
2011 54 51 94.4%
2012 59 55 93.2%
2013 63 56 88.9%
2014 60 55 91.7%
2015 53 50 94.3%
2016 58 56 96.6%
2017 56 53 94.6%
2018 57 53 93.0%
2019 54 50 92.6%
2020 46 44 95.7%
2021 41 41 100.0%
2022 42 42 100.0%
2023 42 40 95.2%
2024 45 45 100.0%
2025 46 22 47.8%
2026 10 0 0.0%

795 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 887 6.1% 43.4% 38.2% 2.8%
2 360 2.8% 24.4% 47.5% 14.2%
3 86 3.5% 11.6% 64.0% 14.0%
4 35 0.0% 8.6% 65.7% 20.0%
5 12 0.0% 8.3% 66.7% 16.7%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
1.6%
2008
1.6%
2009
17.9%
2010
14.3%
2011
7.4%
2012
6.6%
2013
6.2%
2014
3.7%
2015
3.1%
2016
9.3%
2017
5.4%
2018
1.3%
2019
1.6%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.3%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
3.3%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.