Examiner Chie Yew

Grant ratio: 62.1% (25th percentile in Art Unit 2139 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91255
Primary art unit
2139
Work group
2130
Technology center
2100
Applications
301
Granted applications
187
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5282
Supervisor
Reginald Bragdon
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4204

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 68.9% 2.09
Group 138 68.8% 2.08
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 769 office actions across 301 applications
Applications with office actions 96.7% 291 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 3.3%
1 OA 102 33.9%
2 OAs 76 25.2%
3 OAs 24 8.0%
4 OAs 49 16.3%
5+ OAs 40 13.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 40.0% 2014 2015: 35.3% 2015 2016: 36.8% 2016 2017: 53.8% 2017 2018: 58.3% 2018 2019: 65.4% 2019 2020: 84.4% 2020 2021: 93.3% 2021 2022: 91.3% 2022 2023: 86.4% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 36.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20145240.0%
201517635.3%
201619736.8%
2017261453.8%
2018241458.3%
2019261765.4%
2020322784.4%
2021302893.3%
2022232191.3%
2023221986.4%
20242020100.0%
2025331236.4%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 291 3.4% 6.5% 77.7% 6.9%
Action 2 189 1.6% 3.7% 83.6% 9.0%
Action 3 113 1.8% 4.4% 83.2% 10.6%
Action 4 89 0.0% 3.4% 86.5% 10.1%
Action 5 40 0.0% 5.0% 82.5% 12.5%
Action 6 26 3.8% 0.0% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.1% 7 of 138 office actions
All years 2.2% 17 of 769 office actions
Change +2.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
2019: PEG
1.3%
1.8%
3.3%
2.4%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
7.3%
2025: August memo
7.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 5, 2023 16/214,799 Reversed §103
Feb. 17, 2021 13/935,303 Reversed §103
Mar. 2, 2020 15/032,327 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jan. 17, 2020 13/778,396 Affirmed §101 · §112
Dec. 31, 2019 14/010,316 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 3, 2019 14/013,154 Reversed §103
Nov. 19, 2018 13/976,957 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 25, 2018 13/834,739 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.