Examiner Jennifer Nichols

Grant ratio: 25.7% (24th percentile in Art Unit 2142 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2024
Grant ratio 25.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.70
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89685
Primary art unit
2142
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
144
Granted applications
37

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 33.3% 2.55
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.39 536 office actions across 158 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 158 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 34 21.5%
2 OAs 33 20.9%
3 OAs 26 16.5%
4 OAs 31 19.6%
5+ OAs 34 21.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 33.3% 2014 2015: 25.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 38.5% 2018 2019: 41.7% 2019 2020: 46.2% 2020 2021: 30.8% 2021 2022: 9.1% 2022 2023: 28.6% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2013600.0%
201421733.3%
201520525.0%
2016700.0%
20171700.0%
201813538.5%
201912541.7%
202013646.2%
202113430.8%
20221119.1%
20237228.6%
20243266.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 158 1.9% 5.1% 92.4% 0.6%
Action 2 124 0.8% 5.6% 92.7% 0.8%
Action 3 91 0.0% 2.2% 96.7% 1.1%
Action 4 65 0.0% 1.5% 98.5% 0.0%
Action 5 34 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 16 office actions
All years 0.7% 4 of 536 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 3, 2025 16/845,451 Affirmed §103
Jun. 5, 2020 13/427,830 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 24, 2018 13/407,342 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jan. 26, 2018 13/181,294 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 9, 2016 13/432,809 Affirmed §103
Sep. 26, 2016 13/436,541 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 29, 2016 13/404,645 Affirmed §100 · §103 · §112
Jul. 26, 2016 13/462,015 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 11, 2013 11/557,357 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.