AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Barbara M Level

Examiner Barbara M Level appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 66.1%, they average 2.00 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.00
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(303) 297-4748
Predicted Supervisor
Mariela Reyes
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1006
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2140 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
339
Granted Applications
224
Non-Granted Applications
115
Avg OA / Grant
2.00
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2142 , 2144 , 2175
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 66.1% 2.00
Art Unit 22 48.3% 2.41
Group 158 37.3% 2.41
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 3 1 33.3%
2015 13 5 38.5%
2016 15 7 46.7%
2017 30 14 46.7%
2018 25 14 56.0%
2019 36 25 69.4%
2020 33 26 78.8%
2021 31 26 83.9%
2022 30 28 93.3%
2023 34 29 85.3%
2024 38 26 68.4%
2025 46 23 50.0%
2026 5 0 0.0%

224 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 337 3.3% 3.0% 84.0% 1.2%
2 160 2.5% 2.5% 93.8% 0.0%
3 103 1.0% 0.0% 96.1% 1.0%
4 46 0.0% 0.0% 97.8% 2.2%
5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.2%
2017
1.3%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
2.1%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.6%
2023
7.8%
2024
14.6%
2025
20.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.