Examiner Alex Olshannikov

Grant ratio: 42.3% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2142 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.23. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 42.3%
Average office actions / grant 3.23
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92075
Primary art unit
2142
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
388
Granted applications
164
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0667
Supervisor
Scott Baderman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3644

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 33.3% 2.55
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.07 1,191 office actions across 388 applications
Applications with office actions 95.6% 371 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 17 4.4%
1 OA 87 22.4%
2 OAs 87 22.4%
3 OAs 47 12.1%
4 OAs 78 20.1%
5+ OAs 72 18.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 10.0% 2015 2016: 24.0% 2016 2017: 22.7% 2017 2018: 25.0% 2018 2019: 36.8% 2019 2020: 65.0% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 70.6% 2022 2023: 92.6% 2023 2024: 59.3% 2024 2025: 28.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014100.0%
201510110.0%
201625624.0%
201722522.7%
201828725.0%
2019381436.8%
2020402665.0%
2021241666.7%
2022513670.6%
2023272592.6%
2024271659.3%
2025421228.6%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 371 1.3% 6.2% 89.8% 0.5%
Action 2 284 0.0% 4.6% 93.7% 0.7%
Action 3 197 0.0% 2.5% 96.4% 0.5%
Action 4 150 0.0% 1.3% 98.0% 0.7%
Action 5 72 1.4% 1.4% 97.2% 0.0%
Action 6 57 0.0% 1.8% 98.2% 0.0%
Action 7 29 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.9% 5 of 269 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,191 office actions
Change +1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.1%
5.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2023 16/958,950 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2021 14/987,940 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Dec. 2, 2020 13/837,888 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2018 13/895,239 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 13/894,306 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.