Examiner Mario M Velez-Lopez

Grant ratio: 64.7% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 2144 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.34. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.34
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87549
Primary art unit
2144
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
453
Granted applications
293
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7971
Supervisor
Scott Baderman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3644

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 46.7% 2.41
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.39 1,082 office actions across 453 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 452 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 172 38.0%
2 OAs 115 25.4%
3 OAs 66 14.6%
4 OAs 52 11.5%
5+ OAs 47 10.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 55.0% 2012 2013: 56.5% 2013 2014: 57.1% 2014 2015: 72.7% 2015 2016: 83.3% 2016 2017: 90.6% 2017 2018: 93.3% 2018 2019: 89.7% 2019 2020: 92.3% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 59.3% 2022 2023: 63.3% 2023 2024: 47.8% 2024 2025: 34.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20116350.0%
2012201155.0%
2013231356.5%
2014352057.1%
2015332472.7%
2016363083.3%
2017322990.6%
2018302893.3%
2019393589.7%
2020262492.3%
2021201890.0%
2022271659.3%
2023301963.3%
2024231147.8%
2025351234.3%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 452 3.3% 3.5% 87.8% 0.9%
Action 2 280 2.5% 1.8% 91.4% 0.7%
Action 3 165 2.4% 0.6% 93.3% 1.2%
Action 4 99 2.0% 0.0% 93.9% 2.0%
Action 5 47 4.3% 0.0% 93.6% 0.0%
Action 6 20 5.0% 0.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.4% 10 of 227 office actions
All years 2.9% 31 of 1,082 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
6.8%
7.5%
2019: PEG
2.4%
0.0%
2.0%
3.7%
5.5%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
6.9%
5.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 20, 2016 13/313,515 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103
Oct. 11, 2016 13/335,600 Affirmed §103
Sep. 22, 2016 13/434,610 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 9, 2016 13/368,843 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2016 12/168,996 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.