Examiner Seung W Jung

Grant ratio: 65.1% (68th percentile in Art Unit 2144 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2025
Grant ratio 65.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90229
Primary art unit
2144
Work group
2140
Technology center
2100
Applications
281
Granted applications
183

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 46.7% 2.41
Group 177 32.8% 2.41
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.67 806 office actions across 302 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 302 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 81 26.8%
2 OAs 87 28.8%
3 OAs 55 18.2%
4 OAs 44 14.6%
5+ OAs 35 11.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 16.7% 2013 2014: 36.4% 2014 2015: 65.7% 2015 2016: 61.5% 2016 2017: 61.5% 2017 2018: 71.4% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 55.0% 2020 2021: 76.9% 2021 2022: 73.1% 2022 2023: 71.4% 2023 2024: 50.0% 2024 2025: 90.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20136116.7%
201411436.4%
2015352365.7%
2016261661.5%
2017261661.5%
2018282071.4%
2019241875.0%
2020201155.0%
2021262076.9%
2022261973.1%
2023211571.4%
2024221150.0%
202510990.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 302 0.3% 5.0% 91.7% 2.3%
Action 2 221 0.5% 5.0% 87.8% 5.0%
Action 3 134 0.0% 1.5% 92.5% 6.0%
Action 4 79 1.3% 1.3% 89.9% 7.6%
Action 5 35 2.9% 2.9% 88.6% 5.7%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 9.5%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 100 office actions
All years 0.5% 4 of 806 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
1.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 29, 2022 16/026,666 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 23, 2022 14/998,325 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 18, 2020 12/976,849 Affirmed in part §103 · §120
Sep. 13, 2019 13/291,122 Reversed §103
Mar. 14, 2018 13/752,682 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 30, 2017 13/088,266 Affirmed §103
Feb. 15, 2017 13/205,848 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 22, 2016 13/104,154 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.