AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David Faber

Examiner David Faber appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 45.3%, they average 3.23 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.23
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2751
Predicted Supervisor
Adam Queler
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4140
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2170 - Graphical User Interface, Document Processing, Power, and Other

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
548
Granted Applications
248
Non-Granted Applications
300
Avg OA / Grant
3.23
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2145 , 2172 , 2177 , 2178
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 45.3% 3.23
Art Unit 17 43.8% 2.85
Group 187 49.7% 2.74
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 24 13 54.2%
2009 32 8 25.0%
2010 22 7 31.8%
2011 30 15 50.0%
2012 23 9 39.1%
2013 25 12 48.0%
2014 27 8 29.6%
2015 40 17 42.5%
2016 33 18 54.5%
2017 21 13 61.9%
2018 27 18 66.7%
2019 30 17 56.7%
2020 34 18 52.9%
2021 31 19 61.3%
2022 26 20 76.9%
2023 34 20 58.8%
2024 23 9 39.1%
2025 44 7 15.9%
2026 22 0 0.0%

248 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 491 4.9% 3.9% 65.6% 4.7%
2 363 12.7% 6.9% 62.8% 7.4%
3 278 8.3% 4.3% 73.7% 7.9%
4 218 6.9% 2.3% 75.2% 8.7%
5 136 6.6% 2.2% 77.9% 7.4%
6 100 9.0% 0.0% 81.0% 6.0%
7 42 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
8 27 7.4% 0.0% 85.2% 7.4%
9 19 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 10.5%
10 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
14.4%
2008
14.6%
2009
11.6%
2010
11.2%
2011
7.2%
2012
7.0%
2013
4.1%
2014
2.6%
2015
3.5%
2016
4.7%
2017
21.6%
2018
8.5%
2019
0.0%
2020
2.2%
2021
1.5%
2022
0.0%
2023
13.0%
2024
7.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.